Re-signing McNabb a smart move

Why? Because for Shanahan and for owner Dan Snyder, McNabb is essentially a caretaker quarterback. He's someone who gives Washington's suspect offense an air of legitimacy, someone who gives the team at least a fighting chance, and someone who brings a nice-guy image to the face of a crumby franchise that hopes to keep fans paying for overpriced seats as the team rebuilds. 

This team has so many holes to fill, on offense and defense, it cannot necessarily afford to invest immediately in a new franchise quarterback. And even if it wanted to, it could take several years to find the right one. And there should be no hurry sign one anyway, it also could take several years for the team to recruit the personnel needed for a serious run at the playoffs.  Redskins fans by and large recognize the team is in desperate need of a major roster upgrade.  But at the same time, they're impatient for competent play after years of mediocrity despite front office hype and flopping big name acquisitions.  McNabb at least theoretically brings competence and credibility at that one key position as the team endeavors to upgrade its O-Line, receiving corps, D-Line, and so on. He doesn't have to be great.  If he plays well across the season, he'll keep hope alive among the fanbase and butts in seats at Fedex Field and he'll make good money.  And if his play is poor or the team is able to bring in a better replacement, they reportedly could cut him without a massive financial hit. 

It seems they got this one right.  But maybe not. An irritated and impatient fanbase, inflamed by sometimes rabid sports talk and DC's notoriously aggressive sports press, simply may not tolerate even a competent team, as the team rebuilds, and may drive him out of town.

Poor Haynesworth has dug his hole

According to NFL Network, Haynesworth complains he has been sold a bill of goods because the Redskins are switching schemes to a 3-4.  My problem with Haynesworth isn't that he wants to leave, it's that he's appeared so out of shape, lazy and uncooperative that no other team wants to give up much for his immense ability.  It's a hole he's dug for himself -- and for the Redskins, who want to unload him because they're changing scheme, which is their due.  He shouldn't whine, because he's got no one else to blame.

Why the McNabb deal is good -- the Skins do care about this year

Differing with Wise's assessment in the post. This trade is good.  It looked  for a while like the new regime was only building toward the future, several years out, with the way they were cutting players and not signing new ones.  But now we see they do care about next season.  Maybe they won't go all the way.  That's pretty damn difficult for even the best teams to do.  But at least now they're working on giving themselves a fighting chance.  And unlike in previous years, we're not spending outrageous money to do so on questionable talent. I always liked Campbell but his throwing style was too slow to be consistent on short passes with a patchwork offensive line and he's been inconsistent with the long ball as well.  McNabb has been great despite terrible protection, and he's never lost his guts or motivation. As a fan, it would be nice to see the Skins at least try to win for the next three years while we rebuild.  My only concern right now is that they build that O-line with young talent through the draft and elsewhere, and quick..

As I was saying ...

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/free-agency/apparently-some-of-you-have.html


Mike Shanahan, Bruce Allen rebuild Redskins at their own, measured pace

It seems there is no pressure on Coach Mike Shanahan and General Manager Bruce Allen to attempt to rebuild the Redskins overnight.

Although Shanahan and Allen have not publicly laid out their plans, the writing appears to be on the wall in large letters. After years of questionable front-office decisions, the Redskins' roster and organization are in the process of being overhauled, albeit slowly...

Recruiting for future years

GM Allen's quick release of significant existing talent and slo-go approach to free agency seem to indicate a long-term view towards recruitment -- with an eye toward the 2011 and 2012 playoffs, rather than this years'. Fanbase should expect more disappointment this year and hope that his choices pay off in the long-term.

Portis on the slide

Washington Times asks are Portis's best days numbered? http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/18/are-portis-best-days-behind-him/ Good question. It would appear so and the apparent reason is the offensive line neglected by Snyder/Cerrato. By the time they fix it, if they ever do, Portis will be 30, maybe 31? Over-the-hill for a featured back these days. It seems ridiculous that Portis fails or refuses to see that Snyder, who he defended as not responsible for the state of the franchise, is the primary reason Portis will never be considered on par with Adrian Peterson. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2009/10/portis_on_daniel_snyder_its_no.html

Zorn's No-Win

I feel bad for Zorn. Washington's troubles never were about him, they were about the offensive line his hire ups put together. When things went bad, Zorn got the blame and now when they seem good (after a win with a strong O-Line performance) someone else gets the credit. It's a no-win, but at least in the end he can take the money and run.