The Washington Post was pressured to drop the "Redskins" from it's Redskins Insider blog.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/post/why-redskins-insider-lost-its-name/2011/03/15/AB755AX_blog.html
It's now called, the Insider, but they should rename the post the "Landover Losers Insider." Landover Losers is a better name for this franchise, which resembles the former, storied Washington-based one only in the name, colors and controversial logo. They should put Snyder's face on the helmet, with a big cigar coming out of his mouth.
Showing posts with label snyder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label snyder. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Portis on the slide
Washington Times asks are Portis's best days numbered? http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/18/are-portis-best-days-behind-him/ Good question. It would appear so and the apparent reason is the offensive line neglected by Snyder/Cerrato. By the time they fix it, if they ever do, Portis will be 30, maybe 31? Over-the-hill for a featured back these days. It seems ridiculous that Portis fails or refuses to see that Snyder, who he defended as not responsible for the state of the franchise, is the primary reason Portis will never be considered on par with Adrian Peterson. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2009/10/portis_on_daniel_snyder_its_no.html
Labels:
adrian peterson,
cerrato,
portis,
redskins,
snyder
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)